<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Curphey - Latest Comments</title><link>http://curphey.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://curphey.disqus.com/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2015 08:15:33 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Quick Recovery When Your Mac Won't Book - Disk Full</title><link>http://curphey.github.com/blog/2012/10/24/mac-wont-boot-full-disk/#comment-1941690819</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You sir, are legendary. Everything works fine now. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jet Withdrawal</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2015 08:15:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Quick Recovery When Your Mac Won't Book - Disk Full</title><link>http://curphey.github.com/blog/2012/10/24/mac-wont-boot-full-disk/#comment-1764988737</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks this actually worked and solved my invalid record count And saved me having to erase and restore thanks so much estellerubio&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Estelle</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2014 14:47:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Quick Recovery When Your Mac Won't Book - Disk Full</title><link>http://curphey.github.com/blog/2012/10/24/mac-wont-boot-full-disk/#comment-1625302815</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Life saver&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">aurelien</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2014 10:17:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Quick Recovery When Your Mac Won't Book - Disk Full</title><link>http://curphey.github.com/blog/2012/10/24/mac-wont-boot-full-disk/#comment-1593999109</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Saved me thanks.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Funtime</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2014 21:40:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Quick Recovery When Your Mac Won't Book - Disk Full</title><link>http://curphey.github.com/blog/2012/10/24/mac-wont-boot-full-disk/#comment-1242241094</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks worked very well&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nilesh</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 Feb 2014 23:44:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Quick Recovery When Your Mac Won't Book - Disk Full</title><link>http://curphey.github.com/blog/2012/10/24/mac-wont-boot-full-disk/#comment-951360191</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for this immensely helpful post. It just saved me a lot of time and money,&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Arun</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Jul 2013 02:41:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Quick Recovery When Your Mac Won't Book - Disk Full</title><link>http://curphey.github.com/blog/2012/10/24/mac-wont-boot-full-disk/#comment-934743937</link><description>&lt;p&gt;HI there&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;my only question is, How do you delete files in mac recovery mode? my imac cant boot up because ive made some changes in the files system. i can start into recovery mode.i can see the the problem files.but i cant do anything with it, cause its prevented me(for good reason).how can i solve this? terminal command or any other methods? please do help me.its kinda urgent. btw, i dont have any installation dvd with me.Thank you&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">zackjords</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 17:54:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Quick Recovery When Your Mac Won't Book - Disk Full</title><link>http://curphey.github.com/blog/2012/10/24/mac-wont-boot-full-disk/#comment-877430672</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm so lost... how do I navigate to my downloads folder?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Natalie</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2013 23:20:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Quick Recovery When Your Mac Won't Book - Disk Full</title><link>http://curphey.github.com/blog/2012/10/24/mac-wont-boot-full-disk/#comment-851467776</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for this post! I'm having this problem and I'm not as familiar with commands. Could you type out exactly how a few of these should be entered? Maybe some generic files I don't need, just so I can restart my computer? Thanks!!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Marswolf</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2013 02:50:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Outsourcing Doesn't Mean the Problem Goes Away</title><link>http://curphey.github.com/blog/2012/11/27/outsourcing-doesnt-mean-the-security-problem-goes-away/#comment-787906462</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Finding skilled resources is one of the biggest challenges faced by companies today, not to mention the investment required to train employees and the attendant infrastructure required, which can rapidly empty funds.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TalonHolder</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2013 04:02:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Great Freelancing Tools</title><link>http://curphey.github.com/blog/2012/11/14/great-freelancing-tools/#comment-781805127</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This all tools are saving your times as well as done project on time.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">software outsourcing company </dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2013 06:07:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Outsourcing Doesn't Mean the Problem Goes Away</title><link>http://curphey.github.com/blog/2012/11/27/outsourcing-doesnt-mean-the-security-problem-goes-away/#comment-781742543</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Outsourcing no need any type of security.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">software outsourcing company </dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2013 04:39:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Outsourcing Doesn't Mean the Problem Goes Away</title><link>http://curphey.github.com/blog/2012/11/27/outsourcing-doesnt-mean-the-security-problem-goes-away/#comment-751891316</link><description>&lt;p&gt;the outsourcing model is an economic model and it is good advice to never forget that.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Laith Bush</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2012 05:14:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Outsourcing Doesn't Mean the Problem Goes Away</title><link>http://curphey.github.com/blog/2012/11/27/outsourcing-doesnt-mean-the-security-problem-goes-away/#comment-734549102</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Their services have assisted organizations from distinctive nations around the world as well.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Branden Thornton</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 23:17:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Outsourcing Doesn't Mean the Problem Goes Away</title><link>http://curphey.github.com/blog/2012/11/27/outsourcing-doesnt-mean-the-security-problem-goes-away/#comment-725955819</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Outsourcing Doesn’t Mean the Security Problem Goes Away.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jacob Warren</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2012 05:52:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Scottish Verdicts and the Security Industry</title><link>http://curphey.github.com/blog/2012/11/27/scottish-verdicts-and-the-security-industry/#comment-720747130</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I just watched that section again (granted quickly). I think hes explaining logic of the graph from the study. I maybe wrong. Either way this talk makes me want to think hard about claims of evidence before acting. Good stuff!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mcurphey</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2012 17:30:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Scottish Verdicts and the Security Industry</title><link>http://curphey.github.com/blog/2012/11/27/scottish-verdicts-and-the-security-industry/#comment-720735667</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Interesting one. I know you mentioned 18:30 as the bit where he talks about unfounded claims, but if you watch at 24:00 he basically says that bugs introduced in production are orders of magnitude more expensive to fix than those in development and cites a large number of studies as backing this up.  These studies are (AFAIK) where the security industry gets this from.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Whether it holds when you move from general bugs to security bugs is perhaps another question, but it does give some basis for the claim...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rory McCune</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2012 17:18:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Great Contracting Tools</title><link>http://curphey.github.com/blog/2012/11/14/new-post/#comment-711006774</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the shout out, Mark. Love the list of apps and tips. I'll have to check out Shoeboxed. Might make a great service for some of our CPAs and accountants.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">CompuPay</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2012 10:54:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: SourceClear - My New Project</title><link>http://curphey.github.com/blog/2012/11/13/sourceclear-my-new-project/#comment-710312030</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Good luck Mark!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Craig k</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2012 14:43:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Smart Devices Require Smart Content</title><link>http://curphey.github.com/blog/2012/10/27/smart-devices-require-smart-content/#comment-703453793</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Test comment&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mcurphey</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 20:10:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Investing in developing software security talent - Mark Curphey</title><link>http://www.curphey.com/blog/2012/10/19/investing-in-software-security-talent/#comment-694068263</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Exactly my man, exactly. Spot on as always. Its moving ahead pretty well actually. We have commitment for 40K, a few "high street" names in the online world (think massive search and social, say no more for now) offering to mentor so ..... we have a friend who runs HR at a big company putting more flesh on the program and we will then aim to publish a formal call for sponsorship in the new year.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mcurphey</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2012 13:48:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Investing in developing software security talent - Mark Curphey</title><link>http://www.curphey.com/blog/2012/10/19/investing-in-software-security-talent/#comment-689138948</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Humm, as per the twitter thread , what are me and Ofer not understanding about this concept (which is a bad idea):&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; "...All Interns accepted into the program would be required to sign-up to work for one of the sponsors for 18 months after the program is completed. All sponsors (but only sponsors) would be able to make offers to candidates and they would choose the most suitable offer. This provides the incentive for sponsors to fund the program in the first place...."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; and&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; "..Exclusive access to the interns for recruiting after the program finishes..." (in the for sponsors part)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Btw , do realize that this is most likely illegal?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dinis Cruz</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2012 09:05:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Investing in developing software security talent - Mark Curphey</title><link>http://www.curphey.com/blog/2012/10/19/investing-in-software-security-talent/#comment-688706874</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Are you imagining something like [Software Carpentry](&lt;a href="http://software-carpentry.org/):" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://software-carpentry.org/):"&gt;http://software-carpentry.o...&lt;/a&gt; only for security?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dennis Groves</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2012 18:35:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Investing in developing software security talent - Mark Curphey</title><link>http://www.curphey.com/blog/2012/10/19/investing-in-software-security-talent/#comment-688145469</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I am honestly not sure what to say dude. I respect your thoughts (you know that) but we will have to agree to disagree on this one. I think you just made something straightforward into something really complicated. I am 5 for 5 so far in verbal sponsorships so I am not going to change something that seems to hit the spot! That said as you said the more talent the better so I would encourage you to create a scheme like you describe at OWASP. Its all good!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mcurphey</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 20 Oct 2012 21:29:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Investing in developing software security talent - Mark Curphey</title><link>http://www.curphey.com/blog/2012/10/19/investing-in-software-security-talent/#comment-688125347</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This is a great idea and I've replied to you at: &lt;a href="http://diniscruz.blogspot.co.uk/2012/10/lets-make-this-happen-investing-in.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://diniscruz.blogspot.co.uk/2012/10/lets-make-this-happen-investing-in.html"&gt;http://diniscruz.blogspot.c...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dinis Cruz</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 20 Oct 2012 20:35:35 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>